Thursday, February 9, 2012

4. The Uncoupling by Meg Wolitzer


I can't wait til I have something to post about a book that it universally positive. I had really high hopes for this book. I read and really enjoyed Meg Wolitzer's book from 2008, The Ten Year Nap. That novel was insightful; kind of sharp and world-weary in a way that I also thought myself at the time, despite that I was one year into what could have been my own ten year nap. I was weary before my time. So I did expect a lot from her follow-up look at the suburbs. Especially with the premise that the grumpy women of the suburbs have stopped having sex with their husbands. That's interesting! But * spoiler alert*, it turns out to be a spell? Led by a teenager? That ends with renewed understanding and hand holding? Boo. Let these adult women have some agency at least.

The terrible irony is that the self-determination and ferocity contained in the play of Lysistrata, performed in the town and which sparks the spell, just vaporises when Wolitzer transposes it onto her characters. The mirroring between the acting and the doing is so weak. I really felt so cheated.

On the strength of The Ten Year Nap, I still plan to catch up with The Position and The Wife, Wolitzer's earlier novels. Let's hope this one was an aberration.

Sunday, January 29, 2012

3. Blue Nights by Joan Didion


Well. Ok. Blue Nights. I don't think I have any thing to say about Blue Nights that wasn't said by Caitlin Flanagan in The Atlantic. Or any thing to say about Caitlin Flanagan said that wasn't said by Heather Havrilesky on Book Forum.

It's hard to agree with Caitlin Flanagan. But she is so on point with her comments about the Didion cliché style in this book: "her sentences and her rhythms and her tics are clichés because we know them so well" (that's me quoting Flanagan quoting Katie Roiphe.) And it is now that I come to the big reveal... I didn't know that this cliché method of writing was Joan Didion. Exactly what I was writing about with Marieke Hardy, that statacco rhythm imbuing everyday objects and actions with expansive meaning, that's Didion. She invented that. In the sixties. I can't believe I didn't recognise that before. One of her best known quotes is from The White Album, which was published in 1979 and demonstrates this perfectly "“The music was not 1968 rock but the kind of jazz people used to have on their record players when everyone who believed in the Family of Man bought Scandinavian stainless steel flatware and voted for Adlai Stevenson".

The style that was driving me crazy so much in You'll Be Sorry When I'm Dead, was driving me so crazy because it's a style that has has been repeated and weakened for 45 years now. Everyone does it. Especially women writers. And the point is to demonstrate that insight that into the everyday that makes people special. Marike Hardy is nothing but a Bi-Lo version of Joan Didion. And I'm pretty sure that when a past winner of Miss Country NSW on ABC 702 this weekend described the moment of her win by remembering the weight of the crown upon her head, it's because Joan Didion "remembered the cool of the crystals on her neck" at her eighth grade graduation.

I'm sorry, Joan Didion, that I ascribed your formidable and original style to "fashion blogs". And I'm sorry that to me it was a cliché before it was an inspiration. I do love what you do and I am going to read more Didion books this year.

Hey, guess what showed up on page 4 of The Uncoupling by Meg Wolitzer, which is next on my list? A sex scene, described as "all bone and tendon and indifference and regret". Joan, girl, you are everywhere.

Saturday, January 21, 2012

2. What I Did by Christopher Wakling.


This book is fairly uninteresting. Can you read the white type above the title? That's really enough. The point of the book is to sympathise with the Dad, but I never do. I know it's meant to be a sort of, parents are human, we make mistakes, we've all been there, could've been me etc. But just no. No, this could never have been me. Not because I can't imagine the initial smack, but because I can't imagine every selfish, thoughtless act that follows, each of which prolong the misery. The consequences of the smack are not out the Dad's control, he actively makes self-centered, anti-child decisions that worsen the situation. The Slap by Christos Tsiolkas worked this theme with a lot more sympathy, humour and detail. Room by Emma Donoghue used the voice of the child narrator with a lot more subtlety and craft.

This week I also read Bossypants by Tina Fey. I'm not counting it because it's a re-read. I just wanted to compare it to Marieke Hardy. There is a gulf between them. Tina Fey is confessional and funny and seriously likeable where Hardy is overshare-y, pretentious and irritating. I love that on parenting, Tina and I independently came up with the theory that the best way to say no to drugs is to stick with beer. And that she gives voice to the mind-bending revelation that every one has once they become a mother, that once upon a time, your own mother mothered you.

There are a couple of bits I don't love, however. Her chapter about breastfeeding voices this really common complaint that I just don't understand at all. That there is this really well-populated, self-righteous, cruel breastfeeding lobby comprised of holier-than-thou breastfeeders who harrass non-breastfeeders and make them feel bad. I have breastfed two babies in the exact crunchy, well-educated American environs she describes (she says Brooklyn and Hollywood, I'll offer Cambridge, Massachusetts and the Northern Virginia suburbs of Washington, D.C.) and have simply never encountered this. I knew women who breastfed on demand and on schedule, for a few weeks or for several years, with pumps and bottles or with boobs out all the time. (ETA: Holy hell, I totally forgot that I regularly went to a playgroup where women cross nursed each others' babies . I did not participate). I also knew women who formula fed from the start, in tandem with breastmilk or not, and those who started formula after a period of breastfeeding. Reasons for not breastfeeding included that it hurt, it wasn't productive, it wasn't convenient at work or at home, or simply "I wanted my body back". I talked about breasts and breastfeeding a lot during the first year of each of my child's life. In that time I never had or heard a single conversation between mothers that wasn't supportive and understanding of whatever feeding choice a mother had made or thrust upon her. Breastfeeding was certainly encouraged but if it wasn't happening, c'est la vie. I think Tina Fey is setting up a dynamic of mothers attacking mothers that doesn't exist. And I think she's doing it because she personally is insecure about formula feeding her baby.

I know how that goes because I, too, am insecure about baby stuff! I think there's a really logical parallel between breastfeeding and vaginally birthing a child. Both activities are on the decline in rich, educated countries, despite both being hugely advantageous for mother and child and much more achievable than the rates of participation would suggest. Both suffer from myths as to the level of difficulty involved, and both have this bad rap for being supported by superior, indifferent bitches. I had two caesareans (sob!) and I'm hugely insecure about this. I almost actively tried to encounter the mean-girl vaginal birth lobby. I joined ICAN, I met doulas and midwives, I talked in a self-flagellating manner about my children's births all the damn time. I was never met with the kind of dismissive show-off-y-ness or aggressive attacks that Tina Fey describes. I don't want to say that it never happens, because I know better than to deny a woman's own descriptions of her life, but for real, it just cannot be that common. I cannot extrapolate from Tina's experience to the wider world, and I'm here to present a counter narrative. In fact, I think that by presenting her experience in general terms- that "Teat Nazis" "brag endlessly" and "grill you about your choices" (See that! She's writing in the second person! That means it didn't just happen to her, it will happen to you!)- she's doing women a disservice. No, not about the breastfeeding! I mean dragging out this idea that women attack each other all the time. Boo! I'm so sick of that.

At best, it happened to Tina, and she thought it happened to everyone. In which, I'm sorry you feel that way, TF. At worst, it didn't happen to her or she knows it doesn't happen to everyone, but she thought it would be funny to include examples of women being bitches over a dumb, girly thing like boozfeeding. Maybe a bit of both. Scenario A, plus she thought it would be funny? I give up.

Ok, onwards and upwards. I've got Meg Wolitzer and Joan Didion on the horizon. Can't wait!

Monday, January 9, 2012

1. You'll Be Sorry When I'm Dead by Marike Hardy.


I think my project in 2012 will be to record all the books I read in a year. I've always wanted to do that. I think I'll do it here. I was going to do it on Facebook, but I think that might piss people off. I burned through a lot of Facebook social capital last year harassing people to vote for some baby photos in a competition. Sorry, world. This way, I can also write a little something (if I so choose) about my book as well.

Over Christmas I read Gimme Shelter by Mary Elizabeth Williams and The Secret Life of France by Lucy Wadham, but I can't quite remember if I finished in them in the new year, or earlier.

The first book I definitely started and finished in 2012 was You'll Be Sorry When I'm Dead by Marike Hardy. It was not great. She's a pretty hacky, clichéd writer, and her stories just irritated me so much. She has a habit of frequently using two sentence structures that I really dislike. One is so describe something, usually a person or group of people doing something, by writing a short sentence that includes two, sort of, typical but unconnected actions, viz, her friends as uncaring stoners: "We opened another beer and turned our backs to the water" (p 240). The other is to describe something (usually a person) by saying they are "all" something, viz, herself as a fourteen year old: "all hotpants and teetering teenage platform shoes" (p 88); her muso mates: "all skinny denim and Beatle boots from Rocco" (p 233); a young footballer: "all stick arms and milky-spindle legs" (p 84).

Look, here's both kinds together! The Fitzroy Lions: "They moved as a pack, all fleshy arrogance and pride. They slapped each other's arses and spat on the grass" (p 83).

That second one is used fairly frequently in blogs- especially fashion blogs- as a short hand way of creating an impression of a person or style, which I get under the pressure of online writing. But jeez, it annoys me in edited, published work. I think I first encountered it in Maggie Alderson's column for the Herald a bit over ten years ago.

Mostly I disliked YBSWID because of my irritation with the character of Marieke Hardy. The chapter where she described three years as a groupie for the band Dallas Crane ("The Bubble") was the worst. I just kept wanting to say "how OLD are you?" It is not cute to be a groupie in your thirties. A little googling leads me to believe the end of the Bubble was about 2007. Maybe 2009. And she was born in 1976. So she was maybe aged 31 or 33 by the end? Either way, far too bloody old. That behaviour is for 20 year olds. Stop being sad.

Her front cover coy side-eye, miserable little boudoir pics in the back cover, and that dreadful, cultivated "fun-feminist" ironic stripper thing she's doing I also find very grim and unappealing.

Or maybe I'm just a grumpy old square with no idea of how to live a bohemian life. A grumpy old square who probably shouldn't read from the "blogs into books" genre.

Let me try something marginally more serious next time. I should warn however, that if anyone ever reads this, I promise to be honest, and if you think of me as a smart person, you will be astounded at the crap I read.

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Rich people are better than us


You know what? I absolutely am getting up at 5am to watch the royal wedding. I know it's anti-feminist and anti-Republican (er, the Australian version therof), I'm going in with my eyes open, and I just don't care. I want to see the pretty horses and the fancy hats and the dress and tiara. I've always been fond-ish of the Royal Wales family; my mum kind of looks like Princess Di and my brother kind of looks like Wills. And an excuse for cake and champagne pre-dawn is never passed up. Especially 5am champagne that you had to *get up* for, not *stay up* for... mmm... sleeping. I might actually get a couple of those Dunkin Donuts commemorative donuts. And then I'll get a whole dozen more of the regular ones. Who am I kidding?

Now, what coverage should I watch? CNN probably won't turn off the scroll- which I truly hate- but might have some actual news and better close ups. Style Channel has a dangerously high chance of a Giuliana Ranic appearance, but will have better dress commentary. Is PBS doing anything? What about my beloved NPR? Do I get BBC America? Must check.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Driving behind weirdos

Seen on driving over the Key Bridge today

This license plate:










And this bumper sticker:



















On this car:


















I've got some ideas about protecting life. Doesn't involve advocating forced pregnancies from behind the wheel of a blind-spot machine that could wipe out my Honda Civic in one foul cloud of 13 MPG exhaust fumes.

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Do you want to know where I was?


I don't know why this is funny.

I set up this blog in October 2009.
I took a hiatus in January 2010 to teach high school history for one semester.
In May, I stopped teaching and took the last class in my masters program.
From May to July, during class, I had to keep a separate blog for my class work.

That blog is here: http://pippateacheshistory.blogspot.com/

You will probably find it very boring, as it references very specific class readings and discussions that are likely to just be confusing to anyone who wasn't there. But, I feel like I should justify my absence. There it is.